Category Archives: Bush regeneration

Grey Box grassy woodland restoration: Mandilla Reserve, Flagstaff Hill, South Australia

Key Words:  Minimal disturbance, bush regeneration, Eucalyptus microcarpa, volunteer, Bush For Life

The Site:  Grey Box (Eucalyptus microcarpa) Grassy Woodland is listed as an endangered ecological community under the EPBC Act 1999. This ecological community was once widespread on the drier edge of the temperate grassy eucalypt woodland belt of south-eastern Australia. In South Australia, this community occupies less than 3 percent of the area it once did before European settlement. One of the remaining suburban remnants of this community can be found in Mandilla Reserve, Flagstaff Hill, SA. The reserve is surrounded by suburban houses and remains under threat from weed and pest invasion, lack of recruitment of canopy species plus degradation associated with urban encroachment (pollution runoff, rubbish, excessive stormwater). Since 1996 the Bush or Life program together with the City of Onkaparinga have supported community volunteers to care for and manage the bush regeneration work within the reserve. The objective was to restore the highly degraded Grey Box remnant into a woodland community representing the unique diverse vegetation it once housed.

Geoff and Barbara Moss, volunteers at Mandilla Reserve

Works:   Two very dedicated community members adopted the site in 1996 and began visiting on average 3 times per week. They used minimal disturbance bushcare techniques to tackle a carpet of bulb weeds such as Sparaxis (Sparaxis bulbifera), Soursob (Oxalis pes-caprae), Bridal Creeper (Asparagus asparagoides) and Cape Tulip (Moraea flaccida) mixed with highly invasive annual and perennial grass species. In the surrounding degraded areas, some strategic planting was also carried out using Grey Box (Eucalyptus microcarpa), Sticky Hop Bush (Dodonaea viscosa) and Sweet Bursaria (Bursaria spinosa) and local sedge seedlings. Four areas were also hand direct seeded with native grasses to encourage ground cover recruitment and discourage weeds. All seed used was collected on site to ensure local provenance was maintained.

The flourishing Grey Box Grassy Woodland now found on the reserve

Success of the combination of natural regeneration and supplementary plantings

Results After thousands of volunteer hours, extensive regeneration of natives occurred on site. The volunteers’ work has transformed the reserve into a flourishing area of lilies, native grasses and understorey shrubs. Today, the vegetation in the reserve is virtually weed free and even native orchids are beginning to return. In addition, the area that the bushland covers has expanded as a result of the planting and direct seeding. Since these works, natural regeneration has also been observed of native sedges including Senecio, Carex, Juncus and native grasses.

Lessons learned:  Regular follow up for several years is vital to the success of any primary clearance work whether or not minimal disturbance techniques are used. Facilitated regeneration can be successfully used with bush regeneration providing it is strategic and complementary to and considerate of existing natural regeneration processes. Maintenance of the plantings or hand direct seeding is also vital to minimise competition from weeds and ensure their success.

Acknowledgements: This site is owned by the City of Onkaparinga Council and is managed in partnership with Trees For Life who train and support volunteers through its Bush For Life program. Thanks goes to Geoff and Barbara Moss, the site’s main volunteers.

Contact:  Jenna Currie, Bush For Life Regional Coordinator, Trees For Life

Research Road Restoration, Strathalbyn, South Australia

Key Words: Minimal disturbance, bush regeneration, Eucalyptus fasciculosa, volunteer, Bush For Life.

The Site: In June 1996 Trees For Life (TFL), a community based not-for-profit organisation, established a volunteer bush regeneration site (known as a Bush For Life site) on a 1.4km long, one chain wide roadside remnant on Research Road about 6km south of Strathalbyn, SA.  At this stage the road was still being used as a vehicle track.  The vegetation was a very diverse Pink Gum (Eucalyptus fasciculosa) Open woodland with occasional mallee eucalypts, a shrub understorey, sedge and herbaceous groundcover and native grasses with many locally rare and vulnerable species including the nationally vulnerable Silver Daisy-bush (Olearia pannosa ssp. pannosa ).  The largest weed problem was Bridal Creeper  (Asparagus asparagoides) which blanketed the site in the cooler, wetter months.  Other threats to the understorey diversity included broadleaf weeds typical of the dry, agricultural landscapes of the lower Murray Plains.  These weeds included Pincushion(Scabiosa atropurpurea), Wild Sage (Salvia verbenaca) and Horehound (Marrubium vulgare ).

Diverse grassy understorey found on the site

Works:  Volunteers worked on a section of the 1,400m long, one chain wide road reserve, using minimal disturbance techniques. The regenerators very carefully removed Bridal Creeper, broad leaf weeds and weed grasses; but they had to contend with the continual degradation of the remaining area. It was really only a heavily rutted, two-wheel track suitable for dry weather use only, but was subjected to indiscriminate and illegal use through all seasons, including rubbish dumping, firewood collection and “bush-bashing”.

The Alexandrina Council closed the road to motor vehicles in September 2008 and it has been allowed to recover now for 4 years.  After the road closure, discussions between Council and TFL centred on whether to leave the vehicle track to regenerate by itself or to “rip” the track to fill in the ruts and promote germination. As ripping the track was predicted to have have promoted prolific broadleaf and grassy weed establishment, particularly given the close proximity of weedy agricultural land adjacent to the linear reserve, the BFL principle of minimal disturbance prevailed and the track was left to regenerate without other intervention.

Before road closure

Results: Today there is a proliferation of native species germinating on the track, with native regeneration on the track itself far outweighing the weed regeneration.

The ruts have filled with leaf litter and have encouraged the germination of spear grasses Austrostipa sp.) and wallaby grasses(Austrodanthonia sp.). As the volunteers discover new seedlings they protected them with branches; but regeneration has become so significant that this is no longer practical.  .

Many Mallee Honey-myrtle (Melaleuca acuminata) and Dryland Tea-tree (Melaleuca lanceolata) seedlings have germinated and are thriving in bare patches.  Many other species are also germinating, including: Golden Wattle (Acacia pycnantha), Hakea Wattle (Acacia hakeoides,) Sweet Bursaria (Bursaria spinosa), eucalypts (Eucalyptus spp.), Ruby Saltbush (Enchylaena tomentosa), Climbing Saltbush ( Einadia nutans ssp. nutans), Old Man’s Beard (Clematis microphylla var. microphylla), Australian Bindweed (Convolvulus sp., and New Holland Daisy (Vittadinia sp.). Black-anther Flax-lily (Dianella revoluta, Mallee Blue-flower (Halgania cyanea,),  Rosemary Dampiera (Dampiera rosmarinifolia ) and Quandong ( Santalum acuminatum) are spreading from the sides onto the track. Areas where once a vehicle could drive have now been reduced to a narrow walking track between seedlings.

Native grasses regenerating on the road after closure

Treatment with Bridal Creeper rust (Puccinia myrsiphylli) began in 2004/2005 with wider and more intense applications applied every year from 2008. In the last couple of years rust has established itself over a large proportion of the site with very little flowering and fruiting detected during 2011.  Volunteers carefully treat plants at both ends of the site by ‘tonging’ with glyphosate  (i.e. using tongs with sponge tips as herbicide applicators) which has been very successful.  Through careful and consistent work, most of the broad-leaved weeds have been virtually removed from site, with only isolated germinations being detected and removed. One other weed – : Soursob (Oxalis pes-caprae – is prolific on site; and has yet to be targeted for control.

Rabbits re-entered the site early in 2006 and by mid-2008 had bred up to occupy 15 locations on site. They caused significant damage to the native vegetation until controlled by baiting in March 2010. The increase in native grasses in the areas treated has been significant.

Lessons learned:  Four significant events have had the greatest effect on this turnaround: the road closure, the control of rabbits, the establishment of Bridal Creeper rust and most significantly the consistent hard work of the site’s Bush For Life volunteers.

Acknowledgements:  This site is owned by the Alexandrina Council and is managed in partnership with Trees For Life who train and support volunteers through its Bush For Life program.

Contact:  Sue Bradstreet.  Regional Coordinator, Trees For Life

Volunteers Maggie Hincks and Dean Mortimer assisting the regeneration

Rotary Park regeneration project, Lismore NSW

Key words: Dry rainforest, regeneration, Anredera cordifolia, long term project, flying-foxes.

Rainforest regeneration works at the 11.5 ha dry rainforest remnant, Rotary Park, Lismore, commenced in in June 1985 under the leadership of Keith King, the then Parks and Gardens Supervisor for Lismore City Council, and inspired by the success of John Stockard at Wingham Brush.

The site, surrounded by residential areas and bordered by a main road, was considered (prior to treatment) so degraded by weed vines that many considered it beyond redemption. The canopy was infested with vines including Madeira Vine (Anredera cordifolia), Asparagus africanus and A. plumosus and Morning glory (Ipomoea spp.) (Fig 1).  Within the forest, the ground was blanketed by Tradescantia (Tradescantia fluminensis) and Madiera Vine tuberlings, with Large- and Small-leaved Privet (Ligustrum spp.) dispersed throughout more degraded areas and edges and gaps often dominated by Lantana (Lantana camara).

Works and results. The project initially trialed minimal disturbance techniques promoted by the bush regeneration movement in Sydney but soon found that higher levels of disturbance were needed to trigger regeneration and render the tuberlings of Madeira Vine and other weed susceptible to herbicide spray.  Adapting the Wingham Method to local conditions, Keith King and the regeneration team led by Rosemary Joseph radically transformed the rainforest into a relatively healthy dry rainforest patch over a period of 10-15 years, although primary work in some parts of the site is still not completed.

Lessons learned. While the project has been highly successful, some problems have arisen that reflect the vulnerability of small areas of forest in a matrix of cleared land. Populations of  Grey-headed Flying-fox (Pteropus poliocephalus) and Black Flying-fox (P.  alecto) established roosts in the forest some years after recovery was apparent but before the project was completed.  This added significantly to the work load as it increased the density and number of weed species, with new species including by Flying-foxes including Giant Devil’s Fig (Solanum chrysotrichum) and tropical fruits such as Guava (Psidium guajava).  When the trees were stripped of foliage by the flying-foxes, the trees were then used as roots by White Ibis (Threskiornis molucca). This contributed additional ammonia which resulted in deteriorated working conditions for regenerators and limited their ability to complete the primary works.  While the project remains on a maintenance budget and most of the forest is holding its restored condition well, current budgets have been insufficient to complete the primary work on all parts of the site.

Acknowledgements. The site is managed by Lismore City Council who have funded the project since its inception.

Contact: Rosemary Joseph  c/o Lismore City Council

Canopy Gap at Rotary Park dry rainforest, Lismore in 1987 (prior to restoration works). (Photo Rosemary Joseph)

Same canopy gap at Rotary Park dry rainforest, Lismore in 1988 (1 year after primary clearing). (Photo Rosemary Joseph)

Same  canopy gap at Rotary Park dry rainforest, Lismore in 2006. (Photo Rosemary Joseph)

Restoration after pipeline installation: Pimpama Northern Gold Coast, Queensland.

Key words: Assisted natural regeneration, topsoil transfer, Wallum Froglet, Regional Ecosystem 12.3.5, pipeline construction.

Mark Bibby

Revegetation works were carried out in 2009-10 to accompany a civil construction project in the northern Gold Coast, Queensland, where a pipeline was being laid through a natural area.

The Regional Ecosystems on site included palustrine wetland (12.3.5), which is habitat for threatened flora species including Phaius australis, P. bernaysii and Schoenus scabripes and the Wallum Froglet (Crinia tinnula).

The goals of the project were to: reinstate vegetation on site after the construction of the pipeline; minimise weed establishment and other maintenance issues; to ensure that no canopy species were replaced over pipes (to avoid root damage to the pipes); and to achieve an optimal  outcome for local biodiversity, including the Wallum Froglet.

Summary of works.  The native vegetation in the path of the pipeline was removed from wet areas with excavators and a crew of regenerators (Figs 1a and 1b). As much as possible of the macrophyte vegetation from the watercourse area was temporarily moved to ‘holding’ trenches, created to allow for a variety of soil moisture levels. (These were lined with plastic and then filled with water).

Some 600 specimens of other plants were removed to a nursery for later replanting. The top 200 mm of topsoil and site litter from the remainder of the site were stripped and stockpiled on site for later replacement.

Fig 1a: Macrophyte holding trenches before replanting.

Fig 1b: Macrophyte holding trenches providing temporary habitat during works.

Following civil works (conducted 8 months after the topsoil stripping) the stored topsoil and litter was replaced (at 30-50mm depth) and plants from the holding trenches replanted in their original positions. Spaces were left between the patches of litter to allow for regeneration from the replaced topsoil. Stumps were replaced on site as habitat.

The 600 nursery-spelled plants were reinstated on site and further planting of tubestock was undertaken, with grasses and sedges translocated from nearby at the site. Seed was collected nearby and spread on site when available. The site was regularly visited by skilled bush regeneration weed control staff members for 12 months.

Results. A high level success was achieved with the translocation of holding trench stock following inundation of the site during summer rains.  After replacement of the topsoil, vegetation and litter, the watercourse and surrounding fringes established well and natural regeneration from the replaced topsoil and germination from the seed dispersed by hand occurred. One year after the completion of works, the site was recovering well (Fig 2a-c) and recent inspections showed that vegetation cover and diversity in the watercourse area is consistent with the pre clearing condition. The terrestrial restoration area is showing good recovery with 15 species (that were not planted on site) observed regenerating. The native to weed ratio is 9:1. Conversely in the area of disturbance (adjacent the project site) without restoration the native to weed ratio is 1:9.

Fig 2a: The watercourse after removal of the vegetation.

Fig 2b: The watercourse upon reinstallation of topsoil and stockpiled plants

Fig 2c: The watercourse after the completion of the contract.

Lessons learned.  The joy of this project was being able to convince the the civil engineers if not also ecologists that a more natural regeneration-style approach could offer preferable outcomes to a standard civil landscaping approach.  Particularly interesting was the need to convince them not to be afraid of some short term ‘mess’ to ensure a good result for a natural area.

Contact: Mark Bibby, Gecko Regen, / 139 Duringan Street,Currumbin, Qld, Australia. Tel:  +61 (7) 5534 6395. Email: ;

Fingal Headland Maritime Themeda Grassland Restoration

Keywords: Grassland, Themeda Grasslands on Sea-cliffs and Headlands, headland ecosystems, bush regeneration, Fingal Head Coastcare, Plectranthus cremnus

Kieran Kinney

Fingal Head, whose first inhabitants are members of the Cudginburra Clan, is a famous beauty spot in the far north coast of NSW, heavily utilised for recreation such as fishing, surfing, whale and dolphin watching and family outings. It is estimated that upwards of 50,000 visitors per annum use the site. As a result of this and other impacts including unfettered goat grazing (commencing around the lighthouse in the late 19th century), the site has many management challenges, including extensive gully and rill erosion, trampling of native vegetation, wildflower harvesting and weed invasion.

Prior to treatment, the ground cover layer was almost completely dominated by a form of the exotic Buffalo Grass (Stenotaphrum secundatum) and a suite of other weeds including Bitou Bush (Chrysanthemoides monilifera ssp rotundata). Because similar headlands in the region (Norries Head and Hastings Point Headland) support the State-listed  Endangered Ecological Community Themeda Grasslands on Sea-cliffs and Headlands it is assumed that Kangaroo Grass (Themeda triandra) was native to the site and became locally extinct due to the history of grazing and weed invasion.

Project works: In 2009 Fingal Head Coastcare determined that work to address the serious weed problems should commence and that trials be undertaken to reintroduce Kangaroo Grass.  Several small plots (100m² ea.) were sprayed with herbicide and slashed (Fig 1). Regenerating weed was regularly removed.

Fig 1: Trial plot 1 –  Natural regeneration within patch of treated Buffalo Grass

The plots were sown with Kangaroo Grass seed collected from other headlands in the region. The material used is a genetically distinct coastal form of Kangaroo Grass that exhibits a unique decumbent growth habit. Ripe fruiting culms were distributed in quadrats as well as randomly over the plots.

In addition to the Kangaroo Grass trials, efforts were made to plant a variety of typical Grass and Forbland species, including Golden Everlasting Daisy (Xerochrysum bracteatum), Evolvulus alsinoides and Chamaechrista maritima. These were propagated in the Fingal Coastcare nursery from seed and stock sourced at nearby headlands.

Results. Regeneration of native species  was extensive across the plots (Figures 2a and 2b). Regenerating native species included Prickly Couch (Zoyzia macrantha), Native Violet (Viola banksii), Angled Lobelia (Lobelia alata) Plectranthus (Plectranthus cremnus) and Beach Bean (Canavalea rosea).

Fig 2a: Typical Buffalo Grass infestation prior to commencement of trials.

Fig 2b: Example of regeneration of native grasses Prickly Couch and Blady Grass after works (Plot 1, 2011).

Both the Kangaroo Grass  and the Everlasting Daisy (Figure 3) have since naturalised on the site. However, the plots revealed very poor rates of germination of Kangaroo Grass, approximately 1 in1000. Germination rates were much higher under controlled nursery conditions

Fig 3: Everlasting Daisy re-established and recruiting on Fingal Headland.

Outcomes and lessons learned The low rate of Kangaroo Grass germination is not regarded as a major impediment to the overall success of the project. As natural processes and cycles come into play, it is probable that Kangaroo Grass will become a significant part of the biota on the headland. That is,  achieving the ultimate aim of a Closed Tussock Themeda Grassland is probably unlikely through reintroduction from the seed sowing methods we used, but may occur naturally over time.

The extensive natural regeneration of the threatened Plectranthus cremnus is a major success of the trials.  This herb species is habitat for a local population of Blue-tongue Lizards and Bearded Dragons. It is a major food source for the reptiles, supplementing their animal diet, which may be very seasonal.

Erosion control has been significantly reduced through active intervention, using hard infrastructure in combination with ‘low key’, passive techniques such as strategic plantings and bush debris.

Local school children are involved in the plantings on an ongoing basis, and have picked up vital local knowledge and site ownership along the way. This project has been a major education experience for the Coastcare group, the Tweed Byron local Aboriginal Land Council and many members of the Fingal Head Community who were previously not aware of this Endangered Ecological Community . The trial areas are now a profusion of wildflowers almost the year round and the Coastcare volunteers receive many compliments from the passing public. During working bees on the site considerable energy is devoted to educating the public about the Grasslands in the hope that this will assist in their protection (and also because it is a lot of fun!)  Anyone who visits the site will be captivated by the delicate beauty of the native flora, the awesome scale of the natural scenery and will surely agree that something special is happening here.

Where to from here?: One of the most challenging and pressing issues facing the headland is uncontrolled pedestrian traffic. Although this may be unavoidable to some extent, it is desirable for the long term health of the ecosystem that some control methods be introduced to the site. Trials have been conducted using bush debris with limited success. More permanent methods would have to be carefully designed and implemented in order to blend with the unique aesthetics of the site. Boardwalk construction has been very successful in key areas, however this type of construction is deemed inappropriate for the grassland proper.  Dense vegetative barriers consisting of tussock forming species such as Spiny Mat Rush (Lomandra longifolia) and Knobbly Club Rush (Isolepis nodosa) are being planted to rationalise the trackways and guide pedestrians away from more sensitive areas.

In terms of the vegetation restoration works, ongoing and extensive follow-up weed control is required and it is envisaged that as each plot is stabilised and achieves manageable levels of autonomy, new areas will be opened up for weed control. It is recommended that a formal Restoration Plan be developed and implemented, perhaps through funding avenues or the involvement of Environmental Science students. This would greatly assist guiding the works over an extended period and help achieve the best possible outcomes for Fingal Headland and the wider community.

Partners and Investors: Fingal Head Coastcare Inc. consulted with the Tweed Shire Council, The Tweed Byron Local Aboriginal Land Council and a number of community groups to plan this project. The community groups include the Fingal Heads Community Association, the Fingal Head Public School, Fingal Rovers SLSC, local businesses and other Tweed Coast Dune care groups.

Contact : Kieran Kinney,  Fingal Head Coastcare Project Manager, 28 Kurrajong Ave Cabarita Beach 2488. Tel:  +61 266763002 Mob: 0457356175.   Email :

More than a decade of bush regeneration at the Wootha Nature Refuge

Key words: Rainforest restoration, assisted regeneration, Nature Refuge, bush regeneration industry funding models

Spencer Shaw

Rainforest restoration work has been carried out at Wootha Nature Refuge since the property was purchased by its current landholder in the early 2000s.

The property, located on the Blackall Range in the Sunshine Coast region of south east Queensland,  contains a mix of pasture on the higher gently sloping ground and remnant rainforest community (Regional Ecosystem 12.8.3) on the escarpment below the range. When works started on this site the rainforest was highly fragmented, with Lantana (Lantana camara) dominating the gullies and patches of Broad-leaved Privet (Ligustrum lucidum) dominating the areas between the rainforest patches. 

Figure 1. Landscape context, Wootha NR is on the southern slopes of the Blackall Range. Greater than 90% of the plateau vegetation has been cleared.

The landholder has undertaken substantial restoration works, complementing his formal protection of the remnant and restoration areas under in-perpetuity agreements with both Local and State Governments (through a Voluntary Conservation Agreement (VCA) and Nature Refuge (NR)).

Works undertaken. Works have been undertaken by Brush Turkey Enterprises since 2002 on a monthly to fortnightly basis for the whole of the last decade. 

The initial control works consisted of the poisoning Broad-leaved Privet in-situ for a 500m strip along the western boundary. The technique employed for control of the Broad-leaved Privet early in the project was “frill & paint” (i.e. stem injection). This was undertaken with a small axe cutting 100mm wide cuts into the bark and allowing 100mm spacing, covering two full circumferences of each tree trunk. Herbicide was applied via a squirt bottle of 1:1 glyphosate 360 and water. Our contemporary control technique is a modification of this technique using small arbor chainsaws. 

Figure 2. Lantana camara control in gullies 2005.

Subsequent contract Bush Regeneration works have been relatively low key over the last 10 years, with as little as eight Bush Regenerator days per year – and have focused on the control of Lantana in the gullies to control exotic vegetation and facilitate rainforest pioneer recruitment.  Lantana control has been undertaken using the “track and overspray” technique. Tracks are cut with both brushcutters or fern hooks and glyphosate 360 herbicide is applied by backpack sprayers at a 1:100 dilution with water. Lantana works are preferably undertaken in winter months, due to access difficulties.

Results. Regeneration in the areas previously dominated by Broad-leaved Privet was rapid.  Many species recruited to re-establish a diverse native edge to the rainforest remnant areas; including rare species such as the Threadybark Myrtle (Gossia inophloia).

Approximately 2 ha of Lantana in the gullies have been replaced by naturally regenerating vegetation including species such as as Bleeding Heart (Homalanthus nutans), Black Wattle (Acacia melanoxylon) and Giant Stinging Tree (Dendrocnide excelsa).

Figure 3. Dendrocnide excelsa recruitment. Also shows Basalt scree slopes which dominate this part of the escarpment.

Lessons learned. Until the early 2000s all funding for ecological restoration works in South-east Queensland were linked to ‘trees planted’, and only allowed for revegetation projects. The novel approach taken by the funding program that the works were initially supported by was to require recipients to quantify ‘trees established’ rather than ‘trees planted’ and it also considered eligible, projects that used natural regeneration as a revegetation method.  As such, the Wootha project was the first in our area to employ bush regenerators to facilitate natural regeneration of native ecosystems.

We consider this project to be a good example of what can happen if there is consistency of follow up undertaken (even if limited) over a long time period.  Too often projects undertake the ‘primary’ clearing of a site but undertake little or no ‘secondary’ or follow-up work.  Although relatively minor annual works take place on this site, the ongoing nature of the funding for this project and hands on involvement by the landholder provides for the steady and incremental restoration of the rainforest. This is achieving actual and long-term success.

Acknowledgements. Funding for our works came initially through the SE QLD Rainforest Recovery Project and later through the VCA with Sunshine Coast Regional Council. The project would not have occurred or succeeded without the landholder’s dedication to both rainforest conservation and the bush regeneration industry in SE Queensland.

Contact: Spencer Shaw, Brush Turkey Enterprises (Natural Area Management), P.O. Box 326, Maleny, QLD Australia 4552; Tel: +61 7 5494 3642 or Mob: 0428 130 769; Email:; Web:

Rainforest restoration on private land – Wompoo Gorge, Huonbrook, NSW

 Key words: Rainforest restoration, assisted natural regeneration, Lantana control, threatened species conservation

Maree Thompson

Wompoo Gorge is a private property located at Huonbrook in the Byron Shire hinterland, north coast NSW. The property provides a link between Nightcap and Goonengerry National Parks with Coopers Creek running along the eastern boundary. Originally covered by lowland subtropical rainforest with a stand of eucalypt forest extending down from the 100m high escarpment, half of the site was cleared early last century and partially converted to pasture and banana plantations. At the commencement of the project, the area contained various stages of rainforest regeneration and dense infestations of Lantana (Lantana camara). Twenty-seven threatened species (10 threatened flora species and 17 vulnerable animal species) have been recorded at Wompoo Gorge. The site has exceptional restoration potential and overall conservation significance.

Lantana infestation before works

An ongoing ecological restoration project is being implemented at the property, based on the recommendations of the Wompoo Gorge (South) Restoration Action Plan. In the three years to date, dense areas of Lantana in the area originally cleared have been controlled by mechanical means. A 4-wheel drive tractor was used to drive over and flatten Lantana over 2ha, returning a few weeks later to slash the Lantana. This method (first developed by Ralph Woodford at Rocky Creek Dam) resulted in the death of the majortiy of Lantana treated. Care was taken to aviod any existing regrowth of rainforest species near edges and regrowth patches.

Bush regeneration works have now been extended over an additional 14ha. A range of weed control techniques (including overspray and use of a splatter gun) have been used in the denser areas of Lantana not accessable by tractor. Hand weeding with brush hooks and loppers and cut/scrape and paint of Lantana is being undertaken in the more lightly invested native vegetation. Fruits from native plants on site have been collected and spread through out regeneration areas, adding to seed in the soil bank and that which is naturally distributed.

Tractor clearing of Lantana

A monitoring program was established on site prior to the commencement of works. This included eight monitoring transects. Structural and floristic information was collated and photos taken prior to the commencement of works and then at the end of the first year. Data were entered into MERV (Monitoring and Evalution of the Restoration of Vegetation) database and used to produce reports.

From Lantana to bare ground in Year 1

Results. The previously dense Lantana areas have converted from weed to strongly regenerating rainforest by means of natural regeneration occurring over the 3 years since treatment. The areas first treated in Year 1, in particular the area where a tractor was used to control Lantana, have had impressive growth of native species, now up to a height of over 5 metres. Common regrowth species include White Cedar (Melia azederach), Trema (Trema tomentosa), Red Cedar (Toona ciliata), Tamarind, Sandpaper Fig (Ficus coronata), Bangalow Palm (Achontophoenix cunninghamiana), Brown Kurrajong (Commersonia bartramia), Stinging Tree (Dendrocnide excelsa), Pencil Cedar (Polyscias murrayi), Celerywood (Polyscias elegans), Blue Quandong (Elaeocarpus grandis), Black Bean (Castanospermum australe) and Sally Wattle (Acacia sp.). A strong mix of later phase rainforest species are also germinating. Groundcovers include Soft Braken Fern (Culcita dubia), Cunjevoi Lily (Alocasia brisbanensis), Juncus spp., Cyperus spp. and a range of basket grasses (including Oplismenus spp. and Ottochloa gracillima).

Regenerating natives at the end of Year 2. By the end of Year 3 it was difficult to get a view above the regenerating trees to take overview photos.

Lessons learned. As with all projects, follow-up weed control is essential to ensure that native species come to dominate the site in the long term. The project has recently gained funds to continue the works for a further 3 years. This will allow the project to to continue works into nearby areas where it is known that significant and sustainable environmental outcomes can be achieved on a cost effective basis.

Funding. The project is funding by a 3 year NSW Environmental Trust project with addtional support from the 2010 DECCW Great Eastern Ranges Initiative-Connectivity Conservation Incentives; the Northern Rivers CMA Invasive Species Weeds of National Significance program, and the EnviTE Jobs Fund and Green Jobs Corps teams. Further funding has been gained through the Raymond Borland Bequest Grants program and the Big Scrub Rainforest Landcare Group’s Caring for Our Country project.

Contact: Maree Thompson, EnviTE Inc, 56 Carrington Street (P.O.Box 1124), Lismore NSW 2480; Tel: +61 2 6621 9588, Email:

Evans River catchment to coasts corridor – Northern Rivers CMA

Key words: Riparian restoration, weed control, landholder engagement, community training, Erythrina x sykesii

Maree Thompson

The project. A three-year bush regeneration and weed control program was conducted (from June 2009 to March 2012) along nearly 15km of Evans River in north coast NSW. Carried out byEnviTE Environment, the works were designed to meet priority targets of the Northern Rivers Catchment Action plan. A range of weeds degrading vegetation communities were controlled along 61 ha of native vegetation (20 ha of wetland, 31 ha riparian and 10 h of upland native vegetation). This particularly involved the control of Coral Tree (Erythrina x sykesii).

Evans River catchment to coasts corridor drill injecting Coral Trees. Photo: Maree Thompson

Eight of the ten land managers along the river were private landholders, with one parcel of land being part of the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) estate. Private landholders were engaged in the project through Landholder Management Agreement commitments and worked alongside professional bush regenerators, gaining skills and knowledge in weed control techniques and bush regeneration strategies. They saw positive changes in riparian vegetation as a result of the works and through this have increased their understanding and support of environment restoration efforts.

In the case of the NSW NPWS estate, significant areas of primary weed control were undertaken in the last two years of the project. This included control of major infestations of Ochna, a difficult weed requiring further follow up in this area to ensure sustainable environmental outcomes.

Live Coral Tree, Evans River September 2010

As well as on-ground works, the project involved a workshop held in Evans Head with attendees learning how to effectively kill Coral Trees. Project promotion through local media and landcare networks, as well as at the local Evans Head markets, helped to raise awareness in the local community Wider community participation included employment of a member of the Bandjalang people, who are traditional owners of the area.

Its outcomes. Contribution to targets of the NR Catchment Action Plan has far exceeded contract requirements. The Coral Tree infestation in the Evans River Catchment has been reduced to minimal levels.

As future reinfestation will occur due to spread of seed, particularly in floods, from the Richmond catchment – on-going, low level, maintenance is required to gain greatest benefits from the investment to date. 

Poisoned Coral Tree

Lessons learned. This project ran over three years, which to date has been uncommon for projects funded by Northern Rivers Catchment Management Authority (CMA). This allowed us to work across the full cycle of seasons over three years, timing treatments for their optimum time for both the species and OHS requirements. This time period proved highly advantageous as it allowed the achievement of sustainable environmental outcomes and reinforced investments for the Evans River Catchment. As a result, we strongly recommend that the duration of restoration projects be three years or more.

Partners and funding.  The project cost $183,230 over the 3 years, over half of which came from the NSW Environmental Trust, about a quarter came from the Northern Rivers CMA and the remainder was contributed mainly by the EnviTE Jobs fund bush regeneration team, with some contributions from NPWS and Richmond Valley Council.  Landholders’ in-kind contributions was valued at an additional $24,790.

Contact: Mike Delaney, Environment Manager, EnviTE Inc, 56 Carrington Street (P.O.Box 1124), Lismore NSW 2480; Tel: +61 2 6621, Mob: 0429 968 070, Email:

Restoring grassy understorey under Forest Red Gum – Wolston Creek Bushland Reserve, Riverhills, Queensland

Key words: grassy understorey, assisted natural regeneration, Bushcare, Green Panic.

Carole Bristow and Julie Vejle

Wolston Creek Bushland Reserve, is a 47 ha Brisbane City Council (BCC) Bushcare Site at Riverhills, in the south-west outskirts of Brisbane, Queensland. Although only a relatively small area of bushland remains, connectivity is provided by Wolston Creek, its tributaries Sandy and Bullockhead Creeks and the banks of the Brisbane River.

This report is about just one of the plant communities that the Bushcare group (a handful of dedicated locals) is working on: a 1.55 hectare patch of Forest Red Gum (Eucalyptus tereticornis) forest with a grassy understorey (Fig 1).

Fig 1 (a) Understorey of Eucalyptus tereticornis forest at Wolston Creek Bushland Reserve showing a typical swathe of Green Panic before treatment

In mid-2008 when the project commenced, the understorey of the forest was virtually entirely dominated by the exotic grass Green Panic (Megathyrsus maximus var. pubiglumis) due to past clearing and the sowing of pasture grasses for grazing.   However, as there were some native grasses still evident, we wondered whether the site might respond to an assisted natural regeneration approach that has worked on other sites.   Out of curiosity, we cleared Green Panic by hand around a patch of native grasses to give them space to expand. In the process we found that, under the cover of the Green Panic, were struggling native grasses, sedges and wisps of herbs (Fig 2). This then became a test patch, which in turn became a stand of Pitted Bluegrass (Bothriochloa decipiens). The outstanding results energised us to continue.

Fig 2 (a) Much of the site started with very small native germinants which would have been inadvertently killed had the site been sprayed with herbicide. Photo (a) shows how few natives were sometimes initially revealed – in this case Whisker Sedge (Cyperus gracilis), Common Bindweed (Polymeria calycina) and native Glycine sp.

Our treatments. We further cleared the  Green Panic using mattocks. With the weed cover much reduced, rains brought a massive annual weed response.  We considered spot spraying but while the seedbank response was still being discovered, every native plant was important, so the enthusiasm was there to increase hand weeding on an extended basis. To cope with the volume of hand weeding required, removal was aimed mainly at weed individuals that were flowering and/or seeding.  The result was a gradual reduction of weeds and maintenance of a microclimate for germinating natives.

As this site matured and produced such a vigorous response from natives, it became possible to consider other techniques. In January 2009, an adjacent area was slashed by BCC  to prevent Green Panic from seeding into the work area. By May, with good rains, the slashed area had produced a resurgence of natives, so BCC was asked to stop slashing.  We mattocked out the Green Panic crowns, increasing the original work area by 50%.  We realised that slashing several times proved to be a good preparation for primary weeding.  With the Green Panic tops cut and largely decomposed, the pattern of natives and weeds was better revealed and allowed light to trigger germination and growth.

Subsequently, it was found that initial ‘overspraying’ (taking care to spray the standing Green Panic only) produced a similar response.

Results.  Compared with the former near-monoculture of Green Panic, the ground stratum now has abundant native cover comprising: 18 species of native grasses; two sedges; 19 forbs; one shrub; five twiners, and both Forest Red Gum and Maiden’s Wattle (Acacia maidenii) are regenerating.

The area treated within the first year (250 m2) has now been expanded to 1.55 ha.  Of this, 30% can be considered on ‘maintenance’ i.e. stable native cover, requiring minimal visits for the occasional weeds.  A further 65% is undergoing secondary treatment (still requiring regular work to bring it to ‘maintenance’ stage) and about 5% has undergone primary treatment in 2012.

Lessons learned:
1. It is important to try several patches when testing the resilience of a site.  In our case, making a judgement based on one patch of slow response could have caused misinterpretation of the whole site. (Indeed, areas of slow response eventually filled in and helped to create the diverse mosaic of the ground stratum.)
2. Where appropriate, consider slashing/brushcutting/or spraying weedy grasses as preparation for (or initial phase of) primary weeding in areas that have been found to have strong resilience.
3. Try to view the post-primary weed flush (which often appears to be a ‘sea’ of annual weeds)  as part of the recovery process rather than become overwhelmed by it.  The gradual removal of weed still provides protection for germinating natives.
4. Remove weeds before they seed; keep maintenance stage as the goal;  expand the work area in small steps.  (We were lulled into a false sense of success in dry periods, and possibly expanded too quickly.  So we’ve learned to hasten slowly.)
5.  Plant identification is all important. At the start of the project, the main plant we needed to know was Green Panic. In the continual task of sorting weeds from natives, we remind ourselves that ‘If in doubt, don’t pull it out’.  When a plant is found that we don’t know, it is time to take the interesting journey to the Queensland Herbarium.

The main contributing factors to the success so far have been:
The people: curious; persistent; patient; willing to learn from our mistakes; learning to work with nature’s cycles.
The site: has a strong seedbank that was triggered when rains came and its widely spaced trees made it suitable for preparatory slashing.
The motivation:  the reward and excitement of seeing a native plant community build in integrity and diversity.

We anticipate that there is .5 ha yet to treat. Long term success therefore depends upon the continuation of the above factors and continued support from Brisbane City Council.

Acknowledgements.  Brisbane City Council Habitat Brisbane Section, Wolston Creek Bushcare Group, Queensland Herbarium

Contacts:  Wolston Creek Bushcare Group: For more information, email

Geary’s Way Bushcarers – Success is in our sights

Key words: bush regeneration, community engagement, habitat restoration, urban bushland, follow up

Hugh Lander

Geary’s Way Bushcare team tends a small, but important area of recovering bushland in Kylie Avenue, Killara, NSW in the Local Government Area of Ku-ring-gai. In its “native” state the area would have been recognised as a Sydney Turpentine, Ironbark Forest (STIF) but in the century or so since the development of the suburb, the site had degraded to a point where it was highly infested by a wide range of weed species including Balloon Vine (Cardiospermum) and Small-leaved Privet (Ligustrum sinense).

Council records show that, over the last 40 years, several groups of concerned local residents have made attempts to rehabilitate the area and these well-meaning efforts have invariably ended in failure as interest waned or people moved on. However this latest attempt began in earnest in January 2008 and with the help of Ku-ring-gai Council staff, the Council’s Wildflower nursery at St Ives, several successful applications for funding to the Council’s Small Grants Scheme funded by the Environmental Levy and a small but very enthusiastic team of local residents – the project now really looks like it will succeed.

How the site looked before work started just 4 years ago – native trees being “swamped” by Balloon Vine

When the work began there was a deal of consternation in certain quarters because the site had been the subject of several previous attempts at rehabilitation – all of them had failed and each time it seemed that things just got worse. Madeira Vine (Anredera cordifolia), Lantana (Lantana camara) , Balloon Vine (Cardiospermum grandiflorum) and Morning Glory (Ipomoea indica) covered the site to a depth of 4 metres with Lantana and Balloon vine growing 7 – 10 metres up whatever native trees remained, although many of them had already died. Beneath all this nearly every weed known to Ku-ring-gai’s Bushcarers grew in profusion: Crofton weed (Ageratina adenophora), Fleabane (Conyza bonariensis), Onion Weed (Nothoscordum gracile), Senna (Senna x pendula), Slender Celery (Cyclospermum leptophyllum), Moth Vine (Araujia sericifera), Ehrharta (Ehrharta erecta), Tradescantia (Tradescantia fluminensis), African Ivy (Delairea odorata), Fishbone Fern (Nephrolepis cordifolia), Turkey Rhubarb (Acetosa saggitata) , Asparagus Fern (Asparagus aethiopicus.), Fumaria (Fumaria sp.) Nutgrass (Cyperus rotundus) and a wide range of other exotic grasses and forbs.

A recent view of the site – ground cover is Native Geranium (Geranium solanderi)

But things have changed. The small group has made good progress in the 4 years since the current project started but we are well aware that there is a lot more to do. Natural regeneration is occurring all over the site, including Basket Grasses (Oplismenus spp.), Berry Saltbush (Einadia hastata), Bracken Fern (Pteridium esculentum), Bleeding Heart (Omalanthus populifolius), Common Hopbush (Dodonaea triquetra), Gahnia (Gahnia sieberana), Lesser Joyweed (Alternanthera denticulata), Right Angle Grass (Entolasia stricta) and White Dogwood (Ozothamnus diosmofolius). Some recent discoveries include a self-seeded Running Postman (Kennedia rubicunda), a Geebung (Persoonia sp.), Breynia oblongifolia and Pastel Flower (Pseuderanthemum variabile).

A Tawny Frogmouth resting under one of the Turpentine trees planted on site

Wildlife is returning. Swamp wallabies (Wallabia bicolor) have been seen on the site as well as, Eastern Whipbirds (Psophodes olivaceus) a Tawny Frogmouth (Podargus strigoides), Satin Bower Bird (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus) Brush Turkeys (Alectura lathami), and recently a male Lyre Bird (Menura novaehollandiae) and male and female Satin Bower Birds.

A Bower Bird’s bower on site

Outcomes and lessons learned. One of the lessons learned by the Geary’s Way team (comparing our success with the efforts of the past) is that groups intending to work on bushland site rehabilitation should not open up more of the site than they can reasonably follow up with limited resources and time. To do so will only end in failure with the inevitable result that the weeds return in even greater numbers than before.


Our Trainer, Liz Mackay, delivering her Geary’s Way Bushcare Site Assessment to members of the team


We feel that, as a group, we have made real progress. We have worked hard, we have formed a team of (bush)caring locals, we have learned a huge amount (one of the things that we have learned is that there is still so much more to learn), we have gained a real sense of achievement and we want to continue to look after our small site, to nurture it, for the native animals that will benefit from our work, for the native vegetation that is now returning, of its own “free will” to the site and for the generations of Australians who will come after us.

The Geary’s Way Bushcare Team (L-R): Di Harry, Marilyn Algeo, Sue Bardwell, Hugh Lander, Alan Bardwell, Barry Kirtley, Liz Mackay, Barbara Walsh and Ian Coffey

Contact: Hugh Lander, Geary’s Way Bushcare Group Site Convenor; 0411 7547349.